See why 100% of teams that trial both Ivo and Harvey choose Ivo as their preferred vendor.
Harvey was built for law firm workflows. Ivo was built for in-house precision; it's tuned to your playbooks, context, and drafting standards.
Every Ivo playbook is crafted by trained lawyers to reflect your organization's standards. Harvey relies on AI-generated playbooks that lack accuracy and consistency.
Unlike Harvey, Ivo makes targeted edits that an attorney would actually make. No wasted redlines, no extra cleanup.
Ivo is the only legal AI platform that provides redline recommendations based on past negotiations from your contract repository.
Ivo Assistant understands legal nuance and answers questions directly from your contract library, metadata, and playbooks. Harvey is limited to surface-level searches and has weaker reasoning capabilities.
Ivo connects your contracting processes seamlessly from pre-signature to post-signature. Harvey provides disparate feature sets that do not integrate with your existing workflows.
96% of legal teams think Ivo's redlines are more usable. Ivo makes surgical, minimal edits aligned with attorney workflows, whereas with Harvey, users noticed that it would rip and replace entire paragraphs.
91% of legal teams found that Ivo's custom playbooks were more accurate than Harvey's AI-generated playbooks.
91% of legal teams felt that Ivo's Assistant outputs were more useful due to its ability to understand contractual context and nuance.
Ivo is the only legal AI platform with the ability to surface contract relationships and display consolidated base agreements and their amendments in one single view.
100% of legal teams preferred Ivo's platform UI to Harvey's.
Legal AI doesn’t have to be shiny. It has to be accurate, usable, and most importantly, work the way your organization works.
See why Ivo is the preferred option for in-house legal teams today.